Categories
ideological culture national politics & policies partisanship

Promising & Not

“We are capitalist, not socialist.”

Those words are from the “Promise to America” pledge promoted by a new group of the same name and unveiled last week by Reps. Tom Suozzi (D-New York) and Rep. Adam Gray (D-California). 

“Two Democrats in Congress who flipped Republican-held seats in 2024 are launching a pledge for their party’s candidates they hope will act as a rallying cry for centrists,” explains a Washington Post article, dubbing it “a direct rebuke to the party’s leftward tilt as democratic socialists such as New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) capture the party’s energy and activism.”

"We Are Capitalist, Not Socialist." Adam Gray, Tom Suozzi, Democratic Party

“We want safety,” their “Promise” continues, “not lawlessness.”

“No, duh,” would have been the response to such a statement years ago. But today? “Refreshing!”

These Democrats call for “secure borders, safe communities, honest government, and an orderly immigration system that protects the country, strengthens the economy, and treats people with dignity.” It’s a far cry from: Free healthcare for those here illegally!

“We believe America remains indispensable to global stability, democratic values, international security, and strong alliances,” the document expounds. “In a dangerous and uncertain world, America must lead with strength, purpose, and partnership.”

In closing, they declare: “We are proud, not ashamed of America.”

The Post suggests, however, that this slogan “could be polarizing on the left.” 

Sure, it is a much different message than Maine Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner has expressed. On an online forum back in 2021, in a discussion on securing disability benefits from the VA, a fellow veteran vented, “Fuck Uncle Sam,” to which Platner added a clarification: “Fuck him and take his money.”

Which message for Democrats?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


Note: Sorry for the foul language but, frankly, I did not want to cushion the blow.

PDF for printing

Illustration created with Nano Banana

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts

Categories
Thought

Ellul

When we become conscious of that which determines our life we attain the highest degree of freedom.

Jacques Ellul, The Betrayal of Technology (1993).
Categories
Today

Nero’s Famous Last Act

In A.D. 68, on the Ninth of June, Roman emperor Nero committed suicide with the help of his secretary, Epaphroditus. With this act, Nero ended the Julio-Claudian dynasty and started the civil war known as the Year of the Four Emperors, which concluded under the rule of Vespasian. His famous last words?

Qualis artifex pereo

Which translates to “What a great artist dies in me.”

Categories
folly ideological culture

Obama’s Bonkers Beacon

We had the idea of a beacon,” said the architect who designed the Obama Presidential Center.

It looks like . . . a triumph of brutalist . . . whimsy? (Is that even possible?) A science-fictional housing for our ET overlords, maybe. Or something worse. 

Perhaps Baphomet poses inside.

You’ve probably seen the outside of the monstrosity by now. If you’re like me, you’ve marveled at this triumph of bad taste. It surely symbolizes something, but what?

It may serve as an icon for the 44th president’s monumental pretentiousness. 

Or his oblivious ideological bravado.

But it could stand for Political Hubris more generally.

“The Egyptians had their pyramids,” muses Oliver Wainwright in The Guardian. “The Anglo-Saxons had their barrows. And the Americans have their presidential libraries — the chief difference being that the leaders the U.S. venerates are usually still alive at the opening.” Wainwright notes that Americans lack “a royal family or a state religion,” and this has allowed an Imperial Presidency to bloom — filling “the void, transforming over the decades into a national personality cult, complete with its own secular temples to these powerful men.”

He’s not wrong.

But as politics has gotten more extreme, even bizarre, and America’s ideologues and beleaguered voters find themselves anointing a series of increasingly unfit pharaohs (hat-tip to The Guardian’s “pharaonic edifice”), this . . . oddly shaped (“like a Klingon prison”) eyesore . . . serves as a monument, perhaps, for the whole age.

Just don’t blame the architect. “The president was very, very hands on with the design,” Wainwright quotes the genius behind this laid egg. “He talked a lot about his love of Brâncuși.” 

No. 44 being hands-on in the design explains a lot.

The Center hasn’t opened yet; the Grand Opening ceremonies are scheduled for the 18th.

Please let me know how it goes, if you attend. I live near Washington, D.C., and lost my genuflecting and awestruck wonder at that city’s much less ridiculous monuments years and years ago.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


Note: Chicago, a city with beautiful architecture, will survive.

PDF for printing

Illustration created with Nano Banana

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts

Categories
Thought

Jung

Man needs difficulties; they are necessary for health.

Carl Gustav Jung, “The Transcendent Function” (1916).
Categories
Today

Nineteen Eighty-Four

On June 8, 1949, George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four was published.

Categories
Update

Chinese Censorship

“On June 4, the 37th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, internet users across China reported intensified online censorship, including tighter controls by social media platforms and messaging groups on content related — directly or indirectly — to the date.”

Thus begins a June 6 article from The Epoch Times. Quoted here apropos of Paul Jacob’s June 5 article, “The Nerve of Some People.”

The Epoch Times based its reporting on tips from “netiziens” (which is a not-so-common term for “citizens of the Internet”) who told the paper of “not only explicit references to the 1989 massacre, but also indirect expressions, numbers, images, and even routine daily posts appeared to be caught in automated filters or subject to account restrictions. Some described the moderation as unusually strict; one user said the surveillance felt “‘almost frenzied.’”

This shows how important public opinion is for even a tyrannical government. It’s not that the government aims to follow public opinion, but that the communists suppress public discussion to tamp down on opinions that might destabilize citizen acquiescence to the regime. “More than three decades after the Tiananmen Square protests,” the report concludes, “in which the communist regime deployed troops to massacre thousands of pro-democracy protesters, discussion of the event remains heavily restricted within China’s online ecosystem.”

Categories
Common Sense

Lucian of Samosata

φημὶ τοίνυν τὸν ἄριστα ἱστορίαν συγγράφοντα δύο μὲν ταῦτα κορυφαιότατα οἴκοθεν ἔχοντα ἥκειν, σύνεσίν τε πολιτικὴν καὶ
δύναμιν ἑρμηνευτικήν, τὴν μὲν ἀδίδακτόν τι τῆς φύσεως δῶρον,
ἡ δύναμις δὲ πολλῇ τῇ ἀσκήσει καὶ συνεχεῖ τῷ πόνῳ
καὶ ζήλῳ τῶν ἀρχαίων προσγεγενημένη ἔστω.

I say, therefore, that he who would write history well must be possessed of these two principal qualifications, a fine understanding and a good style: one is the gift of nature, and cannot be taught; the other may be acquired by frequent exercise, perpetual labour and an emulation of the ancients.

Lucian, “How to Write History,” 59.34 (tr. T. Francklin, 1780).
Categories
Today

Founders, Fathers

On June 7, 1776, Richard Henry Lee presented the “Lee Resolution” to the Continental Congress. The motion was seconded by John Adams, but was tabled for several weeks. The motion was finally passed on July 2, 1776.

During the 1916 Republican National Convention (June 7 – 10), Senator Warren G. Harding used the phrase “Founding Fathers” in his keynote address . . . and would go on using it in speeches thereafter. It caught on as a eulogistic way to refer to figures such as Thomas Jefferson and, yes, Richard Henry Lee, who orchestrated the American colonies’ break from England’s imperial monarchy.

Categories
Update

Who Lost in L.A.?

On Tuesday, Paul Jacob wrote of the Los Angeles mayoral race, focusing on the top three candidates, incumbent Mayor Karen Bass, Councilwoman Nithya Raman, and the challenger from outside the city machine, Spencer Pratt.

So why is the Babylon Bee making this joke?

While most cities and states seem to be able to figure out who won and who lost by the end of the day of the election, Los Angeles can take days, weeks, or maybe even months to allow for all the mail-in ballots to trickle in, resulting in a spectacular come-from-behind victory for Biden.

Yes, the votes are still coming in, showing Mayor Bass ahead, and Spencer Pratt in second place, as in this from ABC7 Eyewitness News:

But from the same source, we see this headline: “CA primary election results: Bass maintains lead as Raman closes gap in LA mayor’s race with Pratt.” The full graph:

But it is Saturday, and votes in California’s primary elections (with all U.S. House seats and the governor position and more in the balance) are still being counted.

Regardless of who wins, anyone expecting competence in running elections has lost.

Already, rumors of election tampering in the L.A. race are rife on the Internet.